Testing a true 1RM is tiring, technique-heavy and risky. The alternative is a submaximal set to failure (for example 5 reps) and an empirical formula. The calculator below uses seven of them and shows the average and the range.
The formulas and what each one assumes
They all take the form 1RM = load x a factor that grows with reps. Epley: load x (1 + reps/30). Brzycki: load x 36 / (37 - reps). O'Conner: load x (1 + 0.025 x reps). Lombardi: load x reps to the power 0.10. Lander, Mayhew and Wathan use denominators with regression-fitted constants. With 1 rep the 1RM is the load itself, by definition, and the formulas only apply from 2 reps up.
Accuracy drops as reps rise: estimates from 2 to 5 reps are the most reliable, 6 to 10 are reasonable, and above about 10 the error grows because failure starts to depend on endurance and technique. Brzycki is undefined at 37 reps (division by zero). That is why the common practice is to use well-executed sets of 3 to 8 reps and to read the range across formulas, not a single number. It is an estimate: the day, the lift and your technique change the result, and a true test should only be done with a warm-up, safety gear and ideally supervision.
The average is 115.5 kg and the range runs from 112.5 to 119.0 kg, about 5.6% of the average. For planning, a 1RM of about 115 kg is a reasonable guess.
80 kg x 8 reps
Input
80 kg x 8
Expected output
Epley 101,3 | Brzycki 99,3 | média das sete 99,8 kg
At 8 reps the formulas already spread from 96.0 (O'Conner) to 102.1 kg (Wathan): that is why the range matters more than a single value.
60 kg x 10 reps
Input
60 kg x 10
Expected output
Epley 80,0 | Brzycki 80,0 | média das sete 78,6 kg
At 10 reps Epley and Brzycki coincide exactly (60 x 4/3 = 80). Above that Brzycki gives larger values, and the estimate's confidence is only moderate.
Full tool FAQ
It is the heaviest load you can lift for a single full repetition with correct technique in a given exercise. It is a reference for dosing training in percentages, not a goal and not something you are obliged to test.
Frequently asked questions
How many reps should I do to estimate my 1RM?
Between 3 and 8 reps to failure, with good technique, usually give the best balance of safety and accuracy. With 1 rep you already have the 1RM, and with more than 10 the estimate loses a lot of reliability.
Do I really have to go to failure?
The formulas assume the set ended at failure. If you had reps left, your real 1RM is higher than estimated. In that case use the RPE tab, which corrects the calculation for the reps you had in reserve.
Does the same 1RM apply to every exercise?
No. The 1RM is specific to each exercise and variation (flat bench, incline, free squat, machine). Calculate one for each movement you want to dose.
Range across formulas112.5 a 119 kg5.6% of the average apart
Loadable weight (step of 2.5)115 kg
Median116.6 kg
High confidence (2 to 5 reps)
Estimated 1RM by formula
Formula
1RM (kg)
Epley
116.7
Brzycki
112.5
Lander
113.7
Lombardi
117.5
Mayhew
119
O'Conner
112.5
Wathan
116.6
Each formula is a regression fitted to specific groups and lifts, so the values differ. Averaging the seven reduces the bias of any one, but does not remove the error.
How each formula behaves by rep count
The fraction of 1RM each formula assigns to each rep count. They agree closely at low reps and drift apart as reps grow.
Reps
Epley
Brzycki
Lander
Lombardi
Mayhew
O'Conner
Wathan
1
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
2
93.8%
97.2%
96%
93.3%
89.7%
95.2%
95.1%
3
90.9%
94.4%
93.3%
89.6%
87.7%
93%
91.8%
4
88.2%
91.7%
90.6%
87.1%
85.8%
90.9%
88.7%
5
85.7%
88.9%
87.9%
85.1%
84%
88.9%
85.8%
6
83.3%
86.1%
85.3%
83.6%
82.3%
87%
83.1%
8
78.9%
80.6%
79.9%
81.2%
79.2%
83.3%
78.3%
10
75%
75%
74.6%
79.4%
76.4%
80%
74.2%
12
71.4%
69.4%
69.2%
78%
73.9%
76.9%
70.7%
15
66.7%
61.1%
61.2%
76.3%
70.6%
72.7%
66.3%
This is a mathematical estimate, not a real test or a training prescription. Only attempt a true 1RM with good technique, a warm-up, safety pins or a spotter, ideally under professional supervision. If you have an injury or a health condition, talk to a professional first.